Hundred Health is best when you want an integrated program that turns labs, medical history and wearable data into a clinician-built 100-day protocol. AMORTAL is different — it's the independent, auditable decision memory around any program: why each call was made, whether it worked, and a trail you keep even if you switch platforms.
Hundred Health built one of the more tightly integrated proactive-care platforms available: it brings advanced labs, your medical history and wearable data together, then has clinicians build a 100-day protocol from it. It answers the question “what should my program be for the next hundred days?” in one place.
Of all the providers in this series, Hundred is the closest overlap with AMORTAL — both go from data to a plan. The difference is narrower, and worth being precise about: Hundred runs the program; AMORTAL is the independent memory and audit layer around it — why each call was made, whether it worked, and a trail you keep even if you change platforms. Below is a fair, source-backed look at what Hundred is excellent for, and where AMORTAL fits. It’s educational, not medical advice.
+
Use Hundred for the integrated program. Use AMORTAL to record why each call was made, enforce restraint, track whether it worked — and keep that memory if you ever switch platforms.
The short version: who each is for
These two aren’t really competitors — one runs the integrated program, the other keeps the auditable memory around it. Here’s the honest split.
Which one fits which job
Hundred HealthBest for an integrated data-to-protocol programAdvanced labs, medical history and wearable data brought into one platform, with clinicians building a 100-day protocol from it. Strongest when you want a single integrated program that turns your data into a structured plan to follow.
AMORTALBest for an auditable decision memory you keepNot a platform you live inside. An independent decision-and-memory layer that reads whatever results you already have — from Hundred or anywhere — records why each call was made, ranks one next action, enforces restraint, and keeps the trail even if you switch platforms.
This isn't an "A beats B." Hundred runs the integrated program; AMORTAL keeps the auditable, portable memory around it. The strongest setup uses both.
Hundred Health vs AMORTAL, at a glance
Tap between the two to see what each is actually responsible for.
What each one owns
Same goal — a better program from your data — split into the integrated-program job and the decision-and-memory job.
The integrated program
Hundred runs an integrated proactive-care platform — advanced labs, medical-history collection and wearable data combined, with clinicians building a 100-day protocol from it. Hundred advertises 100+ advanced labs (launch coverage cited 160+ and ~$499/year) — verify current.
You want one place that collects your data and turns it into a structured, clinician-built program to follow. Confirm the current marker count, price and what's included before you buy.
The decision-and-memory layer
AMORTAL doesn't run a program or draw blood. It takes your Hundred results (or any source), normalises them into memory, and records why each decision was made — then ranks one next action, enforces restraint, and tracks whether the protocol actually worked, with a trail you keep across platforms.
You want the reasoning behind each change written down, outcomes that are actually attributable, and a decision history you own — independent of whichever platform you're on this year.
AMORTAL has no direct Hundred integration — you bring the data in by upload or manual entry.
The comparison, row by row
| Dimension | Hundred Health | AMORTAL |
|---|---|---|
| Best use case | Integrated data-to-protocol program | Deciding what the data should change |
| Collection method | Lab draw + medical history + wearable ingestion (as advertised) | No draws — works from results you already have |
| Lab partner / processing | Its own network (verify current) | Lab-agnostic; vendor-neutral by design |
| Biomarker breadth | 100+ advanced labs advertised (launch coverage cited 160+ — verify) | Doesn’t test; reads whatever you bring |
| Upload existing labs | Within its own platform | Yes — bring Hundred or any other results in |
| Wearable integration | Ingests wearable data (as advertised) | Connects labs to Oura / Whoop / Apple Watch context |
| Clinician review | Clinician-built 100-day protocols (as advertised) | Clinician-compatible questions; not a clinician |
| Action plan depth | 100-day protocols | One ranked next best action, plus restraint |
| Retesting cadence | Protocol-cycle cadence (as advertised) | Tells you when not to retest yet |
| Result trend tracking | Trends within its platform | Longitudinal memory across providers and time |
| Abnormal-result handling | Within its clinical program (verify) | Safety-gated; routes urgent flags to a clinician, never diagnoses |
| Data portability | Your data lives in Hundred | Cross-provider memory you carry with you |
| Cost model | Membership (launch coverage cited ~$499/yr; verify) | Decision layer — founding membership |
| Where AMORTAL fits | Integrated program in | → ranked decision, watchlist, and outcome loop out |
Provider rows describe what Hundred publicly advertises — and what launch coverage reported — as of June 2026. Marker count, price and what's included change often, and sources currently differ on the numbers, so confirm the current details on Hundred's own pages before buying. Sources are listed at the foot of this page.
Which one fits what you actually want
| What you want | Reach for |
|---|---|
| An integrated program that turns my data into a 100-day protocol | Hundred Health |
| History, wearables and labs collected in one platform | Hundred Health |
| Independent, auditable decision memory I keep across platforms | AMORTAL |
| To record why each protocol change was made | AMORTAL |
| To know whether a protocol actually moved its target signal | AMORTAL |
| To attribute an outcome to the right change, not five at once | AMORTAL |
| To be told when not to make another change | AMORTAL |
| A clinician-ready question, not a treatment directive | AMORTAL |
How AMORTAL complements Hundred Health
The model is simple: let Hundred run the integrated program it’s built for, then keep an independent, auditable record of every decision around it.
- Bring the result in. Upload your Hundred report or enter the key markers — there's no direct integration, so you carry the data over and it becomes yours to keep.
- Normalise into memory. AMORTAL files each biomarker into a longitudinal record, not a one-off screen.
- Connect the context. Results are linked to your goals, history, wearables, medications and constraints.
- Activate the standards. The guidelines and decision rules that actually apply to your situation switch on.
- Produce a Decision Contract. One change at a time, with the expected signal and the window written down in advance — and the reasoning recorded.
- Rank one Next Best Action. Not ten. The single highest-value move — which may be "do nothing yet."
- Set the watchlist. Markers worth re-checking get an expected direction and a recheck window.
- Close the loop. When the next panel or outcome signal arrives, AMORTAL checks whether the action worked — and keeps or discards it, so the protocol learns instead of just running.
A decision loop, end to end
Here’s the same flow on a single example — illustrative numbers only, not a target or a reference range.
From a Hundred result to a tracked outcome
Your Hundred panel and protocol flag, say, a fasting-glucose marker your clinician considers worth watching, and the 100-day plan adds a change. On its own that's a plan step — but not a recorded reason.
AMORTAL files it next to your prior panels, your history, your medications and your wearable trends — so it's read as a trajectory, not a single dot.
One lever, not five. The expected signal and the window to see it are written down before anything changes — with why this lever, recorded as provenance.
Framed as a clinician-ready question — "given this trend, is [one specific lever] the right first move?" — not a treatment directive AMORTAL has no authority to give.
The marker goes on watch with an expected direction and a recheck window — so you retest when it's informative, not on a guess.
At the next draw, AMORTAL checks: did it move as expected, and was it this change that moved it? If yes, the change earns its place; if not, it's dropped — and the trail stays with you even if you switch platforms.
AMORTAL doesn't diagnose and isn't a substitute for your clinician — anything urgent goes to a professional, now.
Is your protocol learning, or just running?
An integrated plan can run for a hundred days without ever telling you whether it worked. Walk your protocol through this before the next change.
Learning, or just running?
Is each protocol change tied to a written expected signal and a window to see it?
When a marker moves, can you tell which change caused it?
If you switched platforms tomorrow, would the decision history come with you?
A change without an expected outcome can't be evaluated. Tie each change to one expected signal and a window before you start — that's a Decision Contract, and it's what turns a protocol step into a result you can read.
You're changing too many variables at once, so outcomes aren't attributable. Move one lever at a time and let its window run — otherwise you'll never know which change earned its place.
Provenance you own beats a protocol locked in one app. Keep the decision history outside any single platform, so the reasoning and the outcomes travel with you when you switch.
Written expected signals, attributable outcomes, and a portable history — that's exactly the auditable, portable loop AMORTAL is built to keep around any program.
Where Hundred is strongest — and where it isn’t
In fairness to both tools:
- Hundred is strongest when you want a single integrated program — labs, history and wearables in one place — turned into a clinician-built 100-day protocol you can follow without assembling it yourself.
- Hundred may be less ideal if your real bottleneck isn’t getting a program but keeping an independent, auditable record of why each change was made and whether it worked — especially if you might switch platforms later.
- Verify before you buy. Marker count, price and what’s included all change, and sources currently differ — Hundred advertises 100+ advanced labs while launch coverage cited 160+ and ~$499/year, so confirm the current details on Hundred’s own pages.
- A protocol is a beginning, not a verdict. Some results will need a clinician, and a plan running isn’t proof it worked; AMORTAL should never be read as a diagnosis.
Bring your results into a decision, not a dashboard
AMORTAL doesn’t need to be where you run every protocol. The stronger model is to let an integrated platform like Hundred run the program, then use AMORTAL as the independent decision system around those results — the one that records why each call was made, enforces restraint, and checks whether the protocol actually worked. Upload a Hundred report, or enter the markers that matter. AMORTAL turns the result into memory, evaluates what’s still missing, ranks the next best action, sets a watchlist for the signals to expect, and later checks whether the action earned its place — with a trail you keep even if you change platforms.
Already have results from Hundred Health? Bring them into AMORTAL and ask the only question that matters: “What should I do next?”
Sources
Provider claims describe what Hundred publicly advertised — and what launch coverage reported — when this page was last fact-checked (26 June 2026). Marker counts, pricing and what’s included are volatile and currently differ between sources, so verify on the official pages before purchase.
Hundred Health — the integrated platform, what's collected, advanced labs and clinician-built 100-day protocols.
HLTH — launch coverage of Hundred Health's integrated proactive-care platform, including reported marker count and price.
Educational only — this is not medical advice or a diagnosis. Talk to a licensed clinician about your own numbers, targets, and any treatment decisions.
Frequently asked
Can I use AMORTAL with my Hundred Health results?
Yes — that's the intended use. Hundred runs an integrated program; you bring its results into AMORTAL by uploading the report or entering the markers that matter. AMORTAL normalises them into a longitudinal memory, connects them to your goals, wearables and any protocols, and returns one ranked next action with the reasoning recorded. AMORTAL does not have a direct Hundred integration; you bring the data in by upload or manual entry.
Does AMORTAL replace Hundred Health?
No. They do different jobs, and this is the closest overlap of any provider we compare. Hundred is an integrated platform that collects data and builds a 100-day protocol. AMORTAL is the independent decision-and-memory layer around any program — it records why each call was made, enforces restraint, and tracks whether a protocol actually moved what it was meant to. Most people who use both keep Hundred for the program and use AMORTAL for the portable audit trail.
Does AMORTAL order the lab tests for me?
No. AMORTAL is not a lab or a draw network and does not order or sell tests. It works from results you already have — from Hundred, a clinician, or any other lab. If a decision genuinely needs a test you don't have yet, AMORTAL will say which one would actually change the call, rather than encouraging you to test everything. The testing stays with Hundred or your clinician; the decision and its provenance stay with you.
What does AMORTAL do after my Hundred results come in?
It files them into your health memory, activates the standards that apply to you, and produces a Decision Contract: one next best action, the single signal you'd expect it to move, and the window to watch. It records why that call was made — the provenance — so later you can audit it. It also sets watchlist items for markers worth re-checking, and will tell you when the right move is to change nothing yet.
Is a bigger panel always better?
Not automatically. Hundred advertises a broad advanced panel, and breadth is genuinely useful for a baseline — but more markers also mean more borderline results that tempt over-reaction. (Sources differ on the exact count, so treat any number as something to verify.) AMORTAL evaluates whether a marker actually changes a realistic decision, whether the result is timely, whether a clinician should weigh in, and what to watch next — so breadth becomes useful instead of noisy.
Hundred already turns data into protocols — what's different about AMORTAL?
Hundred runs an integrated program: collect data, build a 100-day protocol, run it. AMORTAL is the independent, auditable decision-and-memory layer around any program — including Hundred's. It records why each call was made (provenance), enforces restraint when a change isn't warranted, and tracks whether a protocol actually moved its target signal. Crucially, that memory stays with you even if you switch platforms — the decision history is yours, not locked inside one app.